Employers and Unions in 2022: 5 Common Mistakes to Avoid
June 1st, 2022
Even if the current United States labor market doesn’t currently reflect a high percentage of union workers or union organizers, employers should prepare for an upward trend in union representation. Recently, Starbucks, Apple, and Amazon have all experienced attempts from nonunion workers to unionize. Employers in all industries may be seeing the beginnings of more worker interest in collective action, collective bargaining agreements, and organized pushes for higher wages and improved working conditions. To prepare, employers should be aware that all their workers are covered by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Organizations must ensure they are compliant with labor law surrounding employers and unions. MP’s HR experts cover the top mistakes employers should avoid. This article covers the top five mistakes employers should avoid.
Employers and Unions: The Top 5 Mistakes
- Threatening employees. Employers must never threaten their staff for choosing to participate in union activities, abstaining from union activities, or attempting to form a union. All employees have the right to participate in or conduct these activities (as long as it’s not interfering with their ability to work). Employers must not suggest they will punish these activities by firing the employee, reducing compensation or benefits, or making any other changes to their job duties, schedule, work location, etc. It’s important to note that sometimes an employer takes an action that isn’t related to their employee’s union activities (or refusal to participate in union activities) however, the employee may still interpret it in this manner. Organizations should be careful to ensure their staff understand their rights are respected and protected in the workplace. HR experts, like the ones at MP, can assist with reviewing current practices and developing new strategy to ensure NLRA compliance.
- Allowing employees to threaten each other. Similar to what’s stated above, employers should apply these protocols to their employees. They must not let employees intimidate or harass each other for joining a union, abstaining, etc. Managers should discipline this behavior, because it violates their employees’ rights under the NLRA.
- Interrogating employees. Employers may not interrogate their employees about their union activities, interests in unionization or joining/forming a union, etc. They must also abstain from questioning employees or job candidates about how they feel about potential unionization, joining a union, etc. To reduce risk and exposure, employers should refrain from conversations around union activities. However, they should share during onboarding, in the employee handbook, or when asked, that the workplace supports their staff’s rights. It’s important to note that just as employees have the right to unionize or join a union, they also have the right to choose not to participate. Employers are equally responsible for avoiding the appearance of discriminating against an employee who chooses not to join or support a union.
- Monitoring employees for union activity. Whether these activities occur on or off-site, during or not during work hours, organizations should never spy on their employees to determine what the union is doing, planning, who is joining, etc. Even the appearance of monitoring employees for this type of activity could still significantly increase risk and exposure. Employers must train their managers comprehensively, so their actions are always compliant and supportive of employees’ protected rights.
- Promising or rewarding employees. When it comes to employers and unions, it’s critical that organizations never promise their employees rewards (such as a higher wage, increase in benefits, change in schedule or status or title, etc.) for actions that support (or don’t support) a union. It’s imperative that employers make it clear they are neutral on the topic of union activities. Even if they’re not explicitly making such bargains, managers and leadership should be careful to ensure their actions cannot be read as anything but neutral and compliant on this topic. Managers may benefit from yearly training, and, in some cases, it may be necessary to discipline them for making this mistake. Organizations should not underestimate the potential cost in legal fees, damage to their reputation, or the steep penalties and fines leveraged by the National Labor Relations Board.
Recent Posts
- Overtime Rule Overturned: Navigating the New Landscape for Employers
- How Your Leadership Can Help Maintain Positive Mental Health for Employees
- Understanding the Role of Mental Health in Today’s Workplace, for Business Leaders
- The Current Climate of Home Healthcare: Challenges and Opportunities
- Workforce Planning is a Team Sport: Collaborating for Success
Categories
- ACA (10)
- AI (5)
- BizFeed (6)
- Business Strategy (119)
- COBRA (5)
- Compliance (169)
- COVID-19 (92)
- Diversity (12)
- eBooks (19)
- Employee Engagement (33)
- Employee Handbooks (24)
- ERTC (29)
- FFCRA (7)
- HR (306)
- MP Insider (13)
- Payroll (89)
- PFML (9)
- PPP (24)
- PTO (5)
- Recruiting (53)
- Remote Work (39)
- Return to Work (32)
- Unemployment (1)
- Wellness (22)
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020